- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Euloge Awitor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. This player is non-notable because he has never appeared in a fully-professional league (therefore failing WP:NFOOTBALL), and has not received "significant coverage", therefore failing WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 15:31, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:33, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. J Mo 101 (talk) 17:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Without a pro league appearance, or significant coverage, he fails all relevant notability guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:21, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom Spiderone 13:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 15:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.