Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eulogio Tibay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eulogio Tibay

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Eulogio Tibay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub bio of an inventor sourced only to a patent. I don’t find any in depth coverage in reliable independent sources, just Wikipedia mirrors. Mccapra (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Philippines. Mccapra (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. GNews, GSearch and GBook searches didn't turn up any reliable references. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 01:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to a lack of reliable sources and insufficient information to establish notability.--Loewstisch (talk) 09:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable patent filer; orphaned article. Doesn't pass BIO or GNG.--ZimZalaBim ^talk 03:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.