- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. ---J.S (T/C) 20:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of article does not meet notibility guidelines of WP:BIO-Nv8200p talk 00:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. Nothing in imdb. The film listed in the article is a student film. --Infrangible 01:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree, she is not notable enough. Sue H. Ping 01:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - entertainer without widespread recognition. Fails WP:BIO. MER-C 03:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because it fails WP:BIO as it lacks non-trivial and independent sources. TSO1D 04:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:BIO person is nn. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Davidpdx (talk • contribs) 14:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete, probable vanity/promotional piece (see author's userpage) of a non-notable actor in a student film. Kuru talk 17:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Absymal failure of WP:BIO. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 00:47, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. --Duke of Duchess Street 02:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Infrangible FirefoxMan 18:03, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone else... I think this can be closed. --Wizardman 18:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.