Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evacuated Tube Transport
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Evacuated Tube Transport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails notability guidelines and violates conflict of interest guidelines. It basically describes a specific brand of vactrain that has not received any significant coverage. As a product, it fails WP:CORPDEPTH. PseudoChron (talk) 14:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to be have been put in wikipedia purely for the purposes of promoting the product/patent/business. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool.Embrittled (talk) 16:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.