Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everest Cast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Everest Cast

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obliged to take AfD for article de-PRODded by its creator without improvement. Non-notable product whose greatest claim to fame is a non-notable award from non-notable org "ictawardnepal.com". Other than this award, sourcing is to the product manual or a DeviantArt page (really). Fails WP:GNG. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:48, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:10, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. J947 Public (talk) 02:16, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep First of all Please do not link my relation with the company. This is from Nepal and I am from Pakistan. Secondly, This award is presented by Information and Communication Minister of Nepal . It is one of the most reputable Awards in Nepal in the technology presented every year to the Top companies. This is national Award for Nepal only that is why it is not presented in your country(I mean not global). There are lots of news resources available online about this award but these are in Nepali language that is why I have not added these.
http://www.bizkhabar.com/technology/29660.html
http://www.clickmandu.com/2017/08/26899.html
http://www.patharionline.com/2017/08/2109
http://ratopati.com/story/10619
http://newsnepal24.com/ict-award-2/
http://www.pahilopost.com/content/-37580.html
http://aarthiknews.com/2017/08/107335
http://newsabhiyan.com/news-details.php?nid=91231
http://saralpatrika.com/news-details/1874/2017-08-18
http://athaiprahar.com/news-details/605/2017-08-18
http://baahrakhari.com/news-details/34731/2017-08-19
https://dainikpana.com/archives/2048
http://kharibot.com/news-details/1046/2017-08-19

EShami (talk) 06:51, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- completely non notable and promotional in nature. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:GNG. Sources re mostly WP:SPIP or otherwise not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi K.e.coffman, This is problem when you even not taking a country's Minister as notable. Please read the detail. Also follow these Online Nepali News sites. These are news websites in Nepali language not WP:SPIP "Self-promotion and publicity".

EShami (talk) 14:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the sources provide evidence of notability. Passing mention on news does not constitute notability. Article is WP:PROMO and fails GNG Hagennos (talk) 21:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.