Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everyday Records
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was G7 Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:20, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Everyday Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Jade Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't seem notable. Seemingly created by a single-purpose account with a COI. Ian¹³/t 12:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Creator blanked the page, and it was tagged for speedy; I've restored, as it's listed here. Nyttend (talk) 12:50, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have done the same to the Jade Adams for consistency. Ian¹³/t 13:45, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Could someone explain why we are debating the deletion of an article that the author wanted speedily deleted by blanking? WWGB (talk) 13:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per {{db-blanked}}. Article's major contributor requested deletion. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 23:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Both articles have been deleted: the author fulfilled WP:CSD#G7 requirements by blanking them, after which they were tagged {{db-g7}} by more experienced editors. — Athaenara ✉ 00:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.