- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Evil Minded (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. LuciferMorgan (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - to correct a misinterpretation/assumption in the nomination. The guideline WP:MUSIC says that demos are general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete True, demos are not guaranteed to be non-notable, but they can be assumed to be unless proven otherwise. So both comments are true. Since no one has demonstrated notability here... David V Houston (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can not find significant coverage for this demo; does not satisfy WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow Talk 17:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.