- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 00:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 56 google hits, is a webportal to RuneScape notable enough to merit its own article?-- Syrthiss 15:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - anon creator of article 69.14.84.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) removed afd notices from page as well as removed the main link on the log to this page. --Syrthiss 22:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no it isn't. ESkog | Talk 00:26, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per ESkog. Stifle 20:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I challenge anyone to find a reason to keep this. This is a blatent advert of a useless scamming website which doesn't even deserve a mention on the page RuneScape. Speedy this. J.J.Sagnella 11:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.