Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exchange Court

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. I change my mind based on the arguments below. Wikipedia can wait. (non-admin closure)  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  17:22, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exchange Court

Exchange Court (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hard to find WP:RS online. Also, WP:CRYSTAL.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  05:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  05:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  05:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look like a crystal ball!

• Keep. Largest building in a city of 1/4 million people. Look a the picture. Arguing "crystal ball" is to suggest it won't get built. Nothing gets built that far and not finished. --doncram 04:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - as noted above, when complete it'll be the tallest building in a highly populated city. It's presently around 50% complete so a bit beyond the fantasy speculation suggested by the nominator. Sometimes, notability is established on a local level and this, given the size, will no doubt make it one the most notable in the city of Salford, but perhaps not on a national or wider scale. In terms of reliable sources, it's not hard to find official information regarding it. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I think we can wait a bit for this one and it is beyond the point of looking into a crystal ball. - Pmedema (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.