- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Execom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable company. The article is the typical company-speak, resembling an advertisement or. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Execom+Novi+Sad shows nothing but PR (prlog.com, openpr.com, linkedin.com), facebooks, company's own websites and similar. The creator, Apopara (talk · contribs) has the same username as company's contactperson. Sorry, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for your company's promotion. No such user (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: a non-consumer tech business with absolutely no showing of importance. Riddled with obvious advertising: Key Competences ... developed software solutions for clients all over the world. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete The author makes several claims of notability, so this isn't A7 material. Not a single one, however can be verified, and my 30 second google search came up with nothing. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 15:31, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonnotable company. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not signify importance, non notable. Renaissancee (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.