Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Executive Summit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 22:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Executive Summit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The article was created as part of an astroturfing campaign by User:IEMA. Adraeus 22:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Advertisement. dcandeto 22:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• weak Keep It may nonetheless be notable. It's a large industry, and if this is the top-level sales meeting it would be N. I asked for documentation about market share. If kept, the puffery can easily be removed--I just now did about half. There is no more justification for including the detailed schedule of a trade show than there is for a middle school. DGG 03:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  There are plenty of "executive summits" for much larger industries. For example, the telecom industry collects more money than annual box office sales every two weeks. The games industry is small when compared to the movies industry, and the games industry is dwarfed by telecom. The size of an industry should not be a criterion for inclusion.

  More to the point, there's nothing particularly notable about this event. These type of events are as common as they come. Or should I start creating articles on every event I produce? As a bonus and worse, ethically and procedurally, User:IEMA and User:Gowardo appear to be working on behalf of Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association (IEMA) without identifying themselves as such. This makes their contributions astroturfing and conflicts of interest. Adraeus 08:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails to establish notability beyond association with GTA video game. - BierHerr 17:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable part of an apprent crypto-spam agenda. --Infrangible 16:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable industry event, even if all spam-like material was removed. Andrwsc 18:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.