Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exergy consortium
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Exergy consortium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable company: no sources and no references. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 01:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Google News turns up nothing relevant for "energy consortium" and "New Delhi". The phrase "energy consortium" is quite common but never seems to relate to this non-notable business. The concept of an "energy consortium" generally might support an article, so deletion should be without prejudice to re-creation. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:31, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to be precise: the company's name is Exergy, not Energy. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 22:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- D'oh! Well, Google News knoweth them not. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 11:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to be precise: the company's name is Exergy, not Energy. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 22:16, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - another search under this shows nothing. Bearian (talk) 21:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:CORP. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.