Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exilant Technologies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Exilant Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Essentially a catalog of their products. There will be nothing much left if the promotional content is removed, except the photo of the board of directors DGG ( talk ) 20:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Questionable, WP:TNT at best and restart if better later. SwisterTwister talk 04:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per DGG a clear WP:ADVERT .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:25, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - A clear case of advertisement which is cleverly concealed. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep . Quite strange to see this direct nomination without any attempt at WP:BEFORE by senior editors involved. Tried to cross check against WP:CORP as well and in this process came across WP:IAR also but could not figure. Devopam (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.