- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--JForget 23:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Non-notable bio. -- Dfait 17:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Ghits show no Roman Philosopher by this name. SkierRMH 17:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per SkierRMH; nominator please use a relevant {{db}} template to request speedy deletions and not AFD. Stifle (talk) 19:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The problem isn't non-notability so much as it is non-existence. If this person really was an ancient Roman philosopher, he probably would be notable enough to warrant an article. And this article was created two years ago, so speedily deleting it seemed inappropriate to me. But with no evidence available of Exmonius's existence, his article should be deleted. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per SkierRMH. STORMTRACKER 94 21:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. TGreenburgPR 22:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nonexistence. Hal peridol 00:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per others. Most likely doesn't exist. Doctorfluffy 06:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.