- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:33, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Google shoots blanks, thus this supposed fish is a Hoax. Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:43, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems like a hoax. Can't find anything about this being relating to the Dopefish, or fish at all. Delete with great expectacularity. --W.marsh 03:32, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and as speedy nonsense. CambridgeBayWeather 10:38, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as unverifiable nonsense. - Sensor 11:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Deletacular ho-ho-hoax. Alf melmac 11:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax. No hits on FishBase either. - Mgm|(talk) 14:52, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Possible speedy as A1. --JJay 12:18, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per Sensor Tedernst 18:09, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.