Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expense Daily

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G12 - copyright violations. Primefac (talk) 16:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Expense Daily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. I couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources to satisfy the notability guidelines. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete, I nearly speedied this one under WP:CSD#G11, corporate spam piece with no reliable sources. All "references" given are self-references to Wikipedia or links to the app store. No independent sources providing in-depth coverage of the app. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 16:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.