Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explorations (journal)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Explorations (journal) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student-run journal, no third-party sources, apparently not indexed anywhere. Does not meet WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:N. Has been prodded before, hence I am taking this to AfD. Crusio (talk) 09:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 09:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, absolutely zero reliable sources, which are needed for basic notability. :Majen27 · talk 11:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This isn't a notable journal, and one wouldn't expect it, given its scope and background. Drmies (talk) 01:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.