Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exponential muscle fiber development
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Exponential muscle fiber development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find no evidence to indicate that this exists. Google searches for "Exponential muscle fiber development" and "EMFD Jose Martinez" yield no results other than this page. Therefore this article fails both a verifiability and notability test. — further, Francophonie&Androphilie sayeth naught (Je vous invite à me parler) 02:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 02:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:14, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I smell a hoax. The name means nothing to me; the technique is supposedly the work of Jose A. Martinez and the article was created by Jamartinez2; "...made into a science..." is so much puffery. Article has no references, and the only thing I can find for a Jose A. Martinez relating to weight lifting is this unrelated patent, with nothing about EMFD. Chris857 (talk) 03:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete puff piece, totally unverifiable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 22:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.