Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extra-TremeRAMA!
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fails WP:V, possible hoax. j⚛e deckertalk 14:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Extra-TremeRAMA! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Likely hoax. Search returns only one link, which is another WP article. Text is copied from Total Drama with only title changes. Certainly nothing more than speculation if not a hoax. | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hoax or not, there's zero indication of notability. JoelWhy?(talk) 12:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No mention of it on pro.imdb.com, and they'd have a listing for it if it were truly in production. Vertium (talk to me) 01:28, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - just gets away from getting G3ed. No trace of WP:N. →TSU tp* 11:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.