Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extracellular

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Glossary of biology#extracellular. Welcome to merge from page history. Article under discussion could not be deleted because its contents have been merged to extracellular space and therefore its page history must be kept for attribution purposes. czar 01:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extracellular

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Extracellular (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article violates WP:NAD, and the encyclopedic content on it is better placed at Extracellular space. Tkondrashov (talk) 01:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Glossary_of_biology#E, where it is defined. Adjectives don't make for good articles, but pointing the reader to the definition in a glossary is a good outcome for what is surely a plausible search term. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 07:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.