Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme rules match

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 06:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme rules match (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article is unnecessary. An "Extreme Rules match" is simply yet another one of WWE's alternate names for a hardcore match. This article covers nothing Hardcore wrestling doesn't. Gavyn Sykes 05:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Redundant Calgary 06:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's just another name for a standard hardcore match. Better yet, redirect to Hardcore wrestling. Lrrr IV 06:44, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable wrestling neologism. Article has only had one content edit which was initial creation. Article was quickly flagged for notability and citations/references concerns, none of which have been addressed in over a month. Nothing linking to article, and no wikilinks present in the article. No content worth merging to Hardcore wrestling. Not sure how popular a neologism it is within wrestling community for whether or not a redirect would be needed. Optigan13 07:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - A redirect is appropriate, in my opinion. WWE uses this match name on ECW all the time, specifically for it's One Night Stand PPV.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavyn Sykes (talk • contribs)
• Delete, there is already a redirect for Extreme Rules [1], and the editor has created this one article [2] on the 6 June 2007, and nothing since. It is full of spelling errors (Chanpionship, premeir, predeterminded, Comming) and completely odd statements like "...can be used to contest a championship match as well as a regular match" and "...can be contested under the following Matches". Darrenhusted 00:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.