Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyes Set to Kill
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep as AfD withdrawn by nominator. Bongomatic 01:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Eyes Set to Kill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No news hits that make "reliable sources" (Danbury News Times article is missing, but even if not, that wouldn't cut it). The web citations are to fansites, the band's own sites, non-reliable sources, or trivial coverage. Bongomatic 01:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. There is a citation of allmusic.com in the article. However, it shows that Reach hit #29 on the Billboard Heatseekers chart. Technically, Heatseekers isn't the album chart, but still, it says this is not the garden variety garage band. I think the correct approach is to expand the article at this point. If more research turns up nothing, then we can revisit the discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 01:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'm not sure if the sources were already there or whether they were added later, but I count 3 reliable sources in the article; 4 if you count the allmusic pages separately). Sourcing is definitely not a problem. - Mgm|(talk) 11:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Hitting the Bilboard Heatseekers chart passes WP:MUSIC, and they're releasing their second album for a well-known label in about two months. Chubbles (talk) 00:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.