- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- F.R.E.E (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Song doesn't have a shred of coverage that I can find. It fails WP:N and WP:MUSIC based on that criteria. ArcAngel (talk) 11:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The song is on itunes and amazon mp3 and every where else it should stay because people think it is interesting —Preceding unsigned comment added by Croniclataus (talk • contribs) 11:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Being on those sites doesn't make it notable - it has to have had significant coverage from reliable, third-party sources, and so far I am not seeing any. ArcAngel (talk) 11:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Per my entry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go U Good Thing about article related to the same singer. Favonian (talk) 11:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 13:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can find no WP:RS to suggest this meets WP:NSONGS. Gongshow Talk 22:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.