- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- F4:Vortex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Related to this AfD. Yet another movie with no assertion of notability. The article creator, Indie Movies, is constantly adding (and, in some cases, readding previously deleted) non-notable films and has been brought up on the conflict of interest noticeboard twice now (the latest showing that the IP may be a sockpuppet), bringing to light that every other film is released by Maverick Entertainment Group. ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 21:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: These three AfDs are also related.
- That's all of them so far. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 22:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: New AfD has appeared here. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 19:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't seem notable. Doc Quintana (talk) 21:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NF. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.