- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as copyvio. Per my comments below, this is ultimately an attempt to re-create a frequently speedied article under a new name. However even without that, this looks to be a clear case of WP:TOOSOON since this essentially seems to be an article based on a paper on a new proposal that has yet to really gain any true traction in the academic world. It's sort of a clear WP:NOT violation for several reasons (not promotion, not repository for original thought, etc.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- FCBoost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable academic proposal. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm opening up an SPI since there seems to be some meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry going on here. The basic gist is that it looks like a group of scientists are trying to add their work to Wikipedia, either by uploading the papers themselves or by creating pages about the work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:27, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- I'm also speedy this as a copyright violation. This is pretty much the same editors (who are now blocked) trying to recreate Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning under a new title in the hopes of evading detection. The original article contained a copyright violation since it was a paraphrase of this paper and this article is a carbon copy of the copyvio version of the original article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.