Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabtek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:02, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fabtek

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Fabtek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Lack of notability other than releasing certain games in the Americas, which is not backed up by sources, while the Workboy claim is backed up by a dubious YouTube source. Arcade flyers are not sources either. Go D. Usopp (talk) 10:02, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, United States of America, and Washington. Go D. Usopp (talk) 10:02, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only passing mentions in Play Meter. The Fabtek Workboy was covered by the Video Game History Foundation. IgelRM (talk) 05:32, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:49, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nothing in google books or newspapers.com. The few things I could find were about different companies of the same name. Fails all notability guidelines because of lack of sourcing.4meter4 (talk) 18:51, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.