- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 16:47, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Factory Guards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a useful redirect. Created and maintained mostly by a banned User:Yongle the Great and his sockpuppets. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 13:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Am I correct that this used to redirect to Ming Dynasty? That's really weird. I would favor simply changing the name of the page to factory guard and making it redirect to nightwatchman and calling it good. Actually, I'm just going to make that new redirect page now and vote delete here, which is simple enough. Carrite (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hello? The notice that you added to the top of the article? "the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed" Anarchangel (talk) 01:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh I missed that. I've restored the redirect. Lonelydarksky (暗無天日) contact me (聯絡) 03:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a useful redirect either to "Ming Dynasty" or to "Night watchman". --MelanieN (talk) 02:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree, not a useful redirect. Yongle the Great is a continual problem, btw. Dougweller (talk) 09:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.