Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith and Freedom
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Faith and Freedom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Self-published with no coverage in reliable sources, thus failing the notability guidelines for books. See also Talk:Faith and Freedom Flex (talk/contribs) 00:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. —A. B. (talk) 21:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete The article is completely non notable. Radio personality went to Inner Mongolia, wrote some books. The Tom Terry article should go as well. Nothing in there except working at a radio station, non notable. scope_creep 00:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment:Author went to the country of Mongolia (not to a province of China) and became CEO of one of the most popular TV stations there (which would be notable enough for its own article). I won't weep about the book, but let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater just because someone happens to live in a remote country. --Latebird 19:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and scope_creep. Doctorfluffy 04:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- I already had this tagged for deletion via PROD -- I'm not sure why we need to go through the AfD process. In any event, see the information I left about my notability search at Talk:Faith and Freedom. --A. B. (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per other comments made relating to this author, sources needed for verifiability. Rudget Contributions 18:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (unless sourced). Seems to be non-notable publication. I couldn't find sources to say otherwise and don't think there are any.Wikidemo 21:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.