Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake Gunbarrel Sequence
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 17:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fake Gunbarrel Sequence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Spam by BlackFrieza promoting some non-notable pastiche youtube clips created by BlackFrieza. -- RHaworth 06:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article doesn't even discuss the "fake" gunbarrel sequences, and these are merely linkspam at the bottom. The actual gunbarrel sequences are the only things mentioned, but we already have an article on the James Bond gun barrel sequence, so nothing to merge. Someguy1221 06:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I did originally flag this for speedy, but agree that it doesn't necessarily fit into a specific category very neatly. It's one of those annoying times when you know something should go as soon as possible, but can't justify it under the regs! Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 08:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above. Odd title. --Haemo 08:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete And I spend a lot of time on the James Bond pages. This article smacks way too much of original research and personal POV, and seriously needs to see the business end of a gun. --Fightingirish 08:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, thoroughly unnotable YouTube linkspam. The chronology is 1. become a YouTube phenomenon, 2. be cited in reliable sources, 3. get a Wikipedia article. Not the other way around. --Dhartung | Talk 08:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong, speedy and snowball delete. Obviously.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 09:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong, speedy and snowball delete per User:HisSpaceResearch. Dalejenkins 13:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball speedy delete A7. I don't think you would have any problems getting this one speedy deleted. Sinece there are no keep !votes we don't actually have to invoke WP:SNOW (yet) MartinDK 15:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleted Fake Gunbarrel Sequence. Being on YouTube, contrary to popular opinion, does not automatically make something notable. Bart133 (t) (c) 19:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Spam and no assertion of notability. Resolute 22:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.