Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fake Sphinx In China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fake Sphinx In China

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe that this is encyclopedic. Sounds like a case of WP:NOTNEWS Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless improved or cleaned up. Wikipedia is not a news source, though this event may be notable. Yet another case of WP:TNT (this seems to be my favorite argument in AfD as of late...) Also open to userfy if creator requests it. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 10:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete; a temporary movie set prop is not notable; otherwise it's a case of Not News.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 12:08, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. While the article isn't particularly well-written, no argument for deletion has been made here. Everyking (talk) 23:00, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I should have linked it but didn't as it was already mentioned. The policy is WP:NOTNEWS.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 00:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I know. How does this article run afoul of NOTNEWS? Everyking (talk) 01:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Rambling essay attempting to be a news piece. Judging by the characteristic citation style, this is part of the ongoing Kyoto University student assignment in which students upload poorly written articles and never come back. --DAJF (talk) 01:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.