- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Neutralitytalk 02:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- FallDown! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable secondary sources unaffiliated with the subject have been shown to provide significant non-trivial coverage of the subject. In other words, not notable. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no indication this is at all notable--Jac16888 Talk 14:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The article is about a video game for IPhones and the like. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This game in particular doesn't meet notability. There are several instances of these kind of "falldown" games (see [1], [2], [3], [4], also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falldown). This post [5] provides some fair coverage but, alas, it's not the same program. I guess the title without the exclamation mark would be suited for presenting the game concept, but I couldn't find any reliable sources discussing that either — frankie (talk) 15:52, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I would think that the blogcritics source would fail WP:RS, though. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I wasn't sure about it either, as it isn't clear how much control does the editorial staff exert. Checking the WP:RSN archives shows the site has not been considered reliable the times it was brought up — frankie (talk) 20:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete — G11 - Article seems like a blatant advert, due to (a) it's articleless link to creator and (b) link to iTunes store. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 17:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – No assertion of notability from this game. Please note, as Ian.thomson has pointed out, that there are several games with the same title in which you need to sift through. –MuZemike 21:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Not me, but frankie. The asterisks and and tabs don't complement each other too well. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) –MuZemike 21:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete — G11 Stuartyeates (talk) 05:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.