Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling In Reverse (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Falling In Reverse (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet any criterion of WP:NM. Contested PROD. Orphan. — Jeff G. ツ 18:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - They are an unsigned band with no albums or EPs, and one released single. Unsurprisingly, I can find no significant coverage about this band in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No real refs (and none knocking around within sight on google or bing). Maybe one day they will warrant an entry, but no evidence of notability yet. Bennydigital (talk) 16:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.