- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 13:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Article looks like it was written by him (writing style same as his website), only result on google is this page. -JeremyBanks Talk 17:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A 17-year-old solo rapper with no label and 200 album sales? I like how he has the Billboard Top 100 option in his table, with all of them being empty. Anyway, fails WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:V, WP:RS, etc. --Wafulz 18:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While noting the irony of someone dubbed "Famous" not meeting notability standards, in this case it's true. Points for ambition, though. I sometimes wish we had a WP: NOT YET. --Pagana 20:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wafulz. Danny Lilithborne 02:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Cannot verify at Allmusic, though there are two "Famous's"-one a rapper. Different credits from this. :) Dlohcierekim 04:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A pity, really. The article is well organized and encyclopedic. :) Dlohcierekim 04:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.