- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Fanwork (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Defines a neologism. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. VasileGaburici (talk) 00:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to fandom? Or maybe fan fiction (fan art is not in good shape)? TheMolecularMan (talk) 01:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "fanwork" is a really unspecific neologism that could refer to any number of things and is not a term used with real legitimacy. I doubt someone would look up "fanwork", find nothing and give up when the likelier terms "fan fiction" and "fandom" are around. JuJube (talk) 07:56, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 01:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: non-notable neologism. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 01:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- DABify - possible search term and useful to point out all the different intended meanings. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 03:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Basically kill it with fire for failing WP:NEO, but I suppose possible redirect to fandom. However the term seems so vague that even such a redirect might be inappropriate. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.