Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fast food and inner city communities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fast food and inner city communities

Appears to be OR and an academic essay LegoTech·(t)·(c) 03:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting read, but it's an essay laced with original research. (Based on my own experience, chicken franchises seem to be insanely popular in the inner city...) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears to violate WP:SYN. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Interesting essay, but Wikipedia isn't the place for it ([[WP::SYN]]). Aleta ^Sing 03:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's a decent essay, but entirely original research and synthesis. I think there's also something rather non-neutral about claiming that "inner cities" have health problems. What exactly is the article defining as "inner city"? Making sweeping generalizations that don't even hold across the US (much less abroad) isn't really a good idea. Bfigura ^(talk) 04:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR.--Berig (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the sourced parts into Food desert which deals with the same issues. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fairly obvious original research. FWIW, "food desert" looks like a tendentious neologism as well, but there do seem to be some sources for the term. Public-healthism is a remarkably useful tool that allows the privileged and sheltered to turn their tastes into moralities. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment OK, this "business-related topics" assignment gets an A minus. Soon as the semester is over, stop worrying about what your dickweed teacher wants, and consider turning this topic into an encyclopedic article. Mandsford (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essay, original research, POV, etc. KleenupKrew (talk) 11:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.