Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. qedk (t 桜 c) 08:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fatz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Fatz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for companies: I've only been able to find non-independent sources, routine coverage ("Local Fatz Cafe Closes" etc.), and routine coverage in trade publications (see WP:ORGIND), which also describes the majority of the citations that were previously in the article. (This was previously prodded and deprodded in 2009. For reasons that remain obscure to me the history prior to 2011 is at Fatz Cafe.) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Searches turn up only passing mentions and local coverage so the article also lacks significant coverage to support notability. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 20:45, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't find anything that would qualify as significant coverage in a reliable, independent source. I see some local coverage (so-and-so branch ___location is opening or closing) and other passing mentions or obvious press releases. Glendoremus (talk) 22:33, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 12:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Lacking in coverage despite 30+ years of life. Dorama285 (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MILL and WP:SIGCOV. Regional eatery, one of hundreds in the United States. Coverage is routine opening and closing of individual sites. Bearian (talk) 01:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.