- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- FaultTrack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No third-party coverage and certainly does not meet notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not appear to pass WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Note, I declined the AfC submission for this company before this was created in article space. Monty845 23:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per WP:N. Monterey Bay (talk) 01:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As above, no 3rd party refs to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 09:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't find any notable and third-party sources, no news articles featuring this company. SwisterTwister talk 22:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.