Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawkham Junction
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fawkham Junction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly fails WP:GNG, relies entirely on one source from 5 years ago. Suggest sourced content be merged into a nearby station article (presumably Ebbsfleet International railway station. Rly junctions generally do not merit their own articles. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and England. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I get lots of hits for the name, but nothing more than brief mentions. What's in the article currently is almost entirely about the lines at and near the junction, not the junction itself. No prejudice against redirection to a suitable target. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.