Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Features included in the Melways Street Directory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 23:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Features included in the Melways Street Directory

The Melway is a street directory, and is notable in the city of Melbourne, Australia as the article linked to shows. However listing what features a street directory contains is not encyclopaedic. Wongm (talk) 12:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is far too detailed and not a likely search term and no reason to re-direct. TravellingCari 15:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No notability outside of the Directory, no reason to include all of it in the article on the Directory. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable in any way, nor is it even useful. I'd be very interested in hearing the rationale of the article's creator as to why he or she even thought this was worth the effort typing in. I don't normally criticize in this way, and of course there's no question of Good Faith, but I just have to ask why in this case. 23skidoo (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:IINFO. Irrelevant information. Murtoa (talk) 03:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.