- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Featurestage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The language of this article is not quite promotional to merit a speedy deletion for advertising in my opinion, but this remains a non-notable software product. The only references are to an open directory, and I am not able to find any reliable sources as defined in the general notability guideline. VQuakr (talk) 04:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find good sources either. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom, no reliable 3rd party refs, no indication of notability. Dialectric (talk) 11:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I am unable to find significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.