Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Signal 2001

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Federal Signal Corporation. –MuZemike 22:43, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Signal 2001

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason JustInn014 (talk) 03:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC) This article is full of crap information, and is just unfixable at this point. I'd tried revamping this article a while back, but there's no feasable way to explain each siren type's difference in words. There's people popping in and spewing unverified (and from what I've personally observed, FALSE) information.[reply]

We really need to cut down the tornado siren articles on here. There really isn't a need for so many.

Redirect to Federal Signal Corporation. A closer look should be given to the other articles that focus on their products to see if redirection is warranted. Location (talk) 04:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to see this kept, although there needs to be references that show notability as a separate topic. none are here at all. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is, most information on Federal Signal, and all those tornado sirens are from word of mouth, and not from some sort of master website, sadly. It is hard to cite references for that. I'd nominate a few other siren articles, but I think it's better to discuess them one at a time. --JustInn014 (talk) 00:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If no one's going to help me with this, I'll just prod the article for speedy deletion. --JustInn014 (talk) 21:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.