Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fen Line Users Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fen Line Users Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article seems to show no referencing and other things. All it does is give the history of the group and aspirations of what the group want done. I'm not sure it is notable enough. Simply south (talk) 13:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Kakofonous (talk) 15:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Kakofonous - WP:NOT a soapbox. Notability not established. — ERcheck (talk) 16:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for reasons above (GowsiPowsi (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete as per other reasons, and Move to http://train.spottingworld.com, where such articles are welcomed! BG7 17:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above, though parts of the article could be included as a summary in Fen Line. Tivedshambo (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not convinced that it satisfies the notability criteria. Adambro (talk) 17:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: just a brief mention of the group's existence on the Fen Line article is all that's needed here. --RFBailey (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.