Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenestrae Communication Server

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fenestrae B.V.. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fenestrae Communication Server

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable product. All the sources for this product are to thefreelibrary.com which does not look like a reliable source to me. Borderline advert. Bonewah (talk) 21:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment thefreelibrary.com is a website which collects articles from newspapers and other publications. Some of the references in this article for example, are from Business Wire which looks like a reliable source. I remain neutral on this debate, but just wanted to clarify the sourcing issue :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 22:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Business Wire, as stated in the first sentence of its article, is a commercial press-release distribution service. The only independent sources I was able to find are [1] and [2], both of which are passing mentions. Article creator has a severe COI, stating only "promotional" and "marketing" in the fair-use rationales of the images he uploaded to illustrate the parent company's article. —Korath (Talk) 03:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fenestrae B.V., the company article. If all they could scrape as references are press releases, it doesn't deserve an article here per teh rulz. Pcap ping 06:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested. DGG ( talk ) 17:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.