Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fergus Henderson (computer scientist)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fergus Henderson (computer scientist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO. the only coverage I could find was the chef by the same name. nothing for his claim to fame about inventing mercury programming language [1]. LibStar (talk) 00:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep at least one bit of secondary coverage is relatively discoverable [2], a paper with Henderson as the primary author is widely cited, [3] (340 cites, for what it's worth). There're a number of other peer reviewed articles published by him, not entirely convinced that GScholar results alone would get him to WP:SCHOLAR, but with the ARN link I think he's notable enough for a bit of an article. . --joe deckertalk to me 18:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Agree with the above Soupy sautoy (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Notable enough for the Professor test, he is well-cited in a field not well known to the layperson. Bearian (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.