- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 00:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is pretty much already convered in the Fetch disambig, and there is no room for expansion beyond the current state. (|-- UlTiMuS 09:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and tidy up - there must be cultural references and suchlike that can be covered. AlexTiefling 10:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no need for the weak justification of "cultural references", which usually translates to "grab-bag of trivia from television and movies". There's definitely more than a perpetual stub here without that. It's amazing sometimes what mathematicians will study. Keep. Uncle G 10:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — and expand Martinp23 12:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep due to mathematical interest. It's a similar problem to baseball players catching fly balls... the trick is to keep the ball moving in a straight line in your field of vision. I'll add some more information. Garrepi 19:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment — I added more about the math behind it (and corrected some inaccuracies). I'm sure there's more info about non-mathematical properties of the game, though. Garrepi 20:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per AlexTiefling, Martinp23, and Garrepi. --HResearcher 01:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This game is ancient, and played the world over. It deserves its own article. Rohirok 02:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.