- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fidget house (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This music style does no seem to exist. No serious sources. --Subfader (talk) 22:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it should stay. How can you say it doesn't exist? I think a lot of Skrillex fits the "genre", especially songs like "Rock n Roll" here's a youtube link supporting my argument, can you hear the fidget in it? specifically listen from 2:10 to 2:42 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOofWzI3flA --Dustinross4 (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No. Proof its existance and add proper sources. I could also create Cow Jazz and link to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXKDu6cdXLI . Can you see the cows in it? Specifically listen from 1:12 to 2:00. --Subfader (talk) 20:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacking sufficient WP:RS citations to satisfy WP:GNG … that it "exists" is not in question … that it is notable by Wikipedia standards, and thus worthy of inclusion, has not been shown … (1) The article from The Guardian titled "Welcome to the fidget house" is suspect because the first mention of "fidget house" (halfway through the article) is linked to the Wikipedia article in question … (2) The link to googleusercontent.com is just a mirror of an entry from the Rate Your Music database, and it makes no mention of "fidget house" … (3) the link to DJ Magazine has evaporated, so it cannot be counted. Happy Editing! — 70.21.5.28 (talk · contribs) 09:07, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable neologism. No reliable sources. —SW— verbalize 16:14, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.