Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fieldwire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fieldwire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR driven / WP:SPIP sources / launch publicity. The article includes a citations to WSJ [1], but it's in the blog area and includes only a para in a roundout of similar minor companies. Raised $6 mil in funding which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an article. Created by Special:Contributions/TheSpiroux with no other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom (I spot checked the sources and agree with the rationale). Martinp (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.