- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Filehold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 22:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 00:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 00:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another Integrated Document Management vendor, with capitals helpfully supplied in case you need assistance in constructing the TLA. Also obvious spam, reads like a PR puff piece: a recognized industry expert in applying state of the art computer architectures including client server to Automated Data Collection designs.... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:CORP with coverage based on case studies from partner sites and press releases. Pcap ping 18:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.