- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 06:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be bandcruft. No references are given (the "footnotes" all refer to the band's own website). The language is POV throughout; the claims of significant following seem to be very exaggerated. I can find no sources that indicate any particular notability. — Haeleth Talk 13:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as bandcruft. Grafikm_fr 14:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Until WP:MUSIC is rewritten to include internet-only releases, anyway. Colonel Tom 15:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete although they are more discussed than most bandcruft entries, as noted above these undoubtedly fail WP:NMG and it's hard to find any neutral discussion of them on which to base a judgment of whether the article itself satisfies WP:NPOV. Just zis Guy you know? 17:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete vanity
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.