Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filipinos in Uganda
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. --BDD (talk) 22:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Filipinos in Uganda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article, currently one sentence long, contains no real information, nor does it have any sources. Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I am withdrawing the nomination in light of the fact that Colonel Warden has rewritten the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment But does an unsourced short article mean it's not notable? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a notable ethnic group, then somebody else can write this article again at a later date when they have actual information to include. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Don't put off to tomorrow what you can do today. Warden (talk) 12:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.